Compare/Contrast of Political Parties Essay

Autonomous PARTY 1) Values and Beliefs - Protect the privilege to life of the honest unborn; - Stop the undeclared wars which are day by day costing American lives and billions of expense dollars; - Stop wild spending, including outside guide, and deal with America’s local needs - End obligation financing of both Federal and State governments; - End the Federal annual assessment, and reestablish a duty based income framework; - Immediately end universal exchange understandings, for example, NAFTA, WTO, and the proposed FTAA, and quit sending lucrative American employments to remote nations; - Reduce migration, and stop all administration appropriations to displaced people; no driver’s licenses for illegals; extradite every expatriate; - Defend America’s virtues; keep God in the promise of devotion; - Support exclusive requirements in training, including consolation of tuition based schools and self-teaching; - Stop the ravaging of shoppers and citizens by the vitality/utility restraining infrastructures; - Defend Second Amendment rights; - Restore an obligation free, premium free cash framework; - Uphold customary marriage and family esteems; 2)History of the Independents - California’s American Independent Party hosts been a polling form qualified political gathering since 1968. The American Independent Party, which presently has somewhere in the range of 300,000 enlisted individuals in California, is associated at the national level with the Constitution Party. - On July 8, 1967, formal association of California’s American Independent Party was finished at a show held in Bakersfield. â€Å"A new gathering is desperately required today in light of the fact that the pioneers of the two existing gatherings, Democrat and Republican, have abandoned the standards and conventions of our nation’s establishing fathers. Control of the legislature, under the mastery of these two existing gatherings, has left the hands of the individuals our administration was made to serve.† - In 1967, Gov. George C. Wallace of Alabama was on the transition to run for President on another gathering ticket. Wallace supporters welcomed with energy the arrangement of the American Independent Party. - On August 3, 1968, the representatives to the state show of the American Independent Party embraced the party’s first stage. This report held colossal importance for An I P activists who hosted joined the new gathering since they needed significant changes in open approaches. 3)Why Independent? - The American Independent Party has kept alive the best of the American standards which have to a great extent been relinquish by the Democrat and Republican parties.The American Independent Party has made due for over a fourth of a century on the grounds that the gathering has had successful pioneers, alongside a well known stage, accentuating regard forever, monetary obligation, a diminished job of government in people’s lives, decrease of the taxation rate, control of wrongdoing, insurance of American organizations, laborers, and ranchers fromâ unfair outside rivalry, and an America first non-interventionist international strategy. 4)Young Independents Today - Some host proposed that the American Independent Get-together might be conflicted in relation to youthful Americans whose perspectives are claimed to be drastically not quite the same as those of moderately aged and more seasoned Americans. The responsibility of Young Americans to the country’s conventional good, political, and financial qualities, nonetheless, stays practically identical to that of other age gatherings. - The fate of the American Independent Party is guaranteed by a business opportunity for its perspectives among youthful Americans who don't have long periods of duty to the predominant gatherings. Today, the political atmosphere in America is evolving. The individuals are searching for new voices, new decisions, new vehicles for political articulation. The individuals are seeking the American Independent Party for authority. POPULIST PARTY 1)History - delegates embraced the foundation of the People’s party additionally called the Populist party - the populists spoke to a great alliance of ranchers, workers, and reformers, which meant to return government to the hands of the individuals - populist pioneers were different and vivid - the populists picked their competitors in the midst of calls for confined movement and a shorter workday for modern workers. - the gathering likewise intended to persuade the legislature to permit the free coinage of silver, a measure that would make silver, not simply gold, lawful delicate. - notwithstanding activity by the ranchers partnerships and the grangers the situation of thousands of ranchers compounded. - the foundation of the populist party called for broad changes - reformers accepted that ranchers and laborers ought to be liberated from the exploitative acts of banks and railways and traders - the populists increased 14 seats in congress, won 2 governorships, and got the biggest number of mainstream votes cast for any outsider during the 1800s - when of the 1896 political race the populist party itself had declined yet a portion of its thoughts entered the standard - the proceeding with wretchedness constrained the vote based gathering into a progressively extreme situation on one key issue-boundless coinage of silver - this position drove numerous populists to help the popularity based applicant william jennings bryan of nebraska - populism started to decay - one factor restricted populism’s quality in the south - people groups party neglected to increase wide help in the south - the southern collusion prompted its memebers to help significant gathering applicants who supported horticultural interests - the hidden purpose behind the disappointment of populism in the south was the issue of racial domination - the southern coalition expected that populism may prompt increases for african americans

The Pledge of Allegiance free essay sample

During the program there would be a banner raising service were his Pledge of Allegiance would be said. Bellamy’s Pledge peruses as: â€Å"I vow devotion to my Flag and the Republic, for which it stands, one country, unified, with freedom and equity for all. † Bellamy included â€Å"to† in October of 1892 so it read: â€Å"to my Flag and to the Republic, for which it stands† In 1924, the Nation Flag Conference, under the Daughters of the American Revolution, changed the words â€Å"my Flag† to â€Å"the Flag of the United States of America,† under the dissent of Bellamy. In 1953, the Knights of Columbus crusaded to have the words â€Å"Under God† added to the Pledge. We will compose a custom paper test on The Pledge of Allegiance or on the other hand any comparable point explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page Their crusade got no place until in 1954, Rev. George Docherty lectured a lesson where he said that â€Å"Apart from the notice to the stage ‘the United States of America,’ it could be the vow of any republic. † In the next weeks, a bill was supported by Senator Homer Freguson to add â€Å"Under God† to the Pledge. It was endorsed as a joint goals on June 8, 1954 and marked into law on Flag Day. Since it was marked in individuals have contended that it is an infringement of the division of chapel and state and it is an illegal â€Å"endorsement of religion. â€Å"Under God† ought to be expelled from the Pledge of Allegiance since it rejects individuals of different religions other than Christianity and nonbelievers. Not all religions have confidence in one God and even those that do, don't state the word God, similar to Judaism. The explanation some accept that â€Å"Under God† ought to be left in is that it is an announcement about American convention. In spite of the fact that America’s establishing fathers were Christian and a significant number of the early pioneers trust in some type of Christianity, America is presently a country of individuals from each religion and there ought to be some thought to their convictions and customs.

10 things I love about MIT

10 things I love about MIT Congratulations! You’ve probably gotten into more than one college and now it’s time to decide which offer to accept. As a senior blogger, I’ve written about this before (here , here, and here), but I thought I’d offer a list of 10 things that I love about MIT (in no particular order.) 1. The students This one is a no-brainer. Thanks to the Admissions people, my classmates are a ridiculously talented bunch with the most diverse interests. There are the pre-meds and the hackers, the thespians and the band geeks, the gear heads and the tissue culture nerds. Everyone is involved with a million activities, which can be frustrating when you’re planning a meeting, but is generally amazing to witness. Additionally, no matter where you live or what your major is, MIT students can always bond over how much work that they have to do. It’s an instant conversation starter. I’m surprised that the song, It sucks to be me, isn’t more popular (maybe because not enough people have seen Avenue Q.) 2. Rooms with a view and living in Beantown I love the river. The majority of dorms are by the Charles River and in Baker, for example, 80% of rooms have a river view. I also can’t imagine a better a college town than Boston. For more about the community service and fun opportunities in Boston, read one of my previous entries here The view from my sophomore year room in Next House (my Baker rooms have better views but I dont have pictures): View from Baker roof: 3. Nobel laureates are a dime a dozen According to the MIT website: “Seventy-one present and former members of the MIT community have won the Nobel Prize, including seven current faculty members: H. Robert Horvitz, medicine/physiology (2002); Wolfgang Ketterle, physics (2001); Richard R. Schrock, chemistry (2005); Phillip A. Sharp, medicine/physiology (1993); Samuel C. C. Ting, physics (1976); Susumu Tonegawa, medicine/physiology (1987); and Frank Wilczek, physics (2004).” These Nobel laureates do not sit perched in ivory towers, there are many opportunities to meet them. Just a few weeks ago, I saw a talk by Carl Wieman (Physics, 2001). Also, thanks to the UROP program, you can do research for all four years of college and who knows, maybe youll get to join this elite Nobel club one day! 4. It’s a meritocracy It doesn’t matter who your great-grandfather was or what year you are, as long as you’re qualified you’ll get a UROP as a freshman, become editor-in-chief of an MIT research journal as a sophomore, and become president of your dorm as a junior. This is a beautiful thing, and not one to dismiss quickly. 5. You have freedom to choose your classes It is so cool to be able to take pretty much any class, in any department, at any school (MIT, Harvard, Museum of Fine Arts, Wellesley.) There are a few classes that are notoriously difficult to lottery into (like some Management classes offered through the Sloan school and some of the pre-med lab requirements), but in general you can’t whatever interests you. If you don’t feel like working too hard in the class, you can take it on pass/no record or as a “listener.” You can play a fun game by going to the subject listings and making a hypothetical schedule for yourself on WebSIS. 6. Freshman 1st semester pass/no record and IAP This is proof that MIT is not out to get you. They’re so kind, in fact, that they give you an entire semester to acclimate to the pressure-cooker of MIT. For more info, read the entries on: Why You Can’t Fail A Class Freshman Year. I’ve probably talked your ears off about IAP, but it’s such a fun time to do whatever you want. This IAP, I worked on my senior thesis, explored Boston, took a wine tasting class, worked out at the gym, and saw several movies. My classmates traveled around the world, got experience in companies through externships, and shadowed doctors in hospitals. To read more, click here. 7. The professors care about you One of the reasons that I didn’t go to University X was because I heard that the professors were much more concerned about their graduate students than the undergrads. At MIT, I would definitely say that this is not the case. When professors are teaching an undergraduate class, they really dedicate a lot of time to preparing the lectures (I heard that it takes ~10 hours to prepare a 1 hour lecture) and they hold weekly office hours where you can just walk into their office and barrage them with questions. Additionally, you’re automatically assigned to a professor who serves are your advisor, and they’re a tremendous resource. 8. People will assume you can fix their cars and build the next space telescope This comic, from the Feb. 29, 2008 issue of The Tech, says it allexcept the attention is not always negative (especially when it gets you a job)! 9. Everybody loves a nerdy joke (or at least they won’t pellet you with rotten tomatoes if you make one) Re: my entry on math jokes: here 10. There’s always too much to do: the work hard/ play hard mentality Sometimes, I’ve had so much work to do that it made me cry. That’s the reality. When it’s 2 am on a Thursday night and you still have half a problem set to do, it’s nice to know that the weekend is just a day away. I’ve never taken the time to count up how many emails I get about events on a particular weekend, but I’d venture a guess that the number is around twenty. There are hundreds of student groups that get money from MIT to host cool events. Consequently, the choices are dizzying.